Skip to content
Close-up of a professional microphone in a shock mount, with blurred headphones in the background. The setting feels technical and focused.

sE Electronics 6160 Shotgun Microphone Review and Performance Overview

A detailed, objective evaluation of the sE Electronics 6160 shotgun microphone, including features, sound performance, and competitive comparisons.

This review examines the sE Electronics 6160 shotgun microphone, a $500 condenser microphone designed for clear and detailed audio capture. The review covers included accessories, physical construction, onboard features, and performance across a range of controlled tests, along with comparisons to other commonly used microphones in similar and adjacent categories.

What’s in the Box

The sE Electronics 6160 package includes the microphone, a protective storage box, a foam windscreen, a microphone clip, and a stand adapter. Documentation and branded stickers are also included.

Build Quality and Features

The microphone features a full metal housing designed for durability while remaining lighter than several competing shotgun microphones, such as the Sennheiser MKH 416 and the Rode NTG3.

Two switches are located on the microphone body: one controls the pad with -10 dB and -20 dB options, and the other engages a high-pass filter at either 80 Hz or 160 Hz. The XLR output is positioned at the base of the microphone. Manufacturing is based in China.

Sound Tests

A series of tests were conducted to evaluate the microphone’s performance in different recording scenarios.

Polar Pattern Test

Rotating the microphone around a sound source demonstrates its supercardioid pickup pattern. The test highlights front-facing sensitivity and off-axis sound attenuation from the sides and rear.

Plosive Test

Plosive handling was evaluated using close-proximity consonant sounds such as “p” and “b.” Results indicate moderate resistance to plosives, with improved performance when used at typical dialogue distances.

Distance and Proximity Effect

Recordings were made at varying distances to demonstrate changes in low-frequency response caused by proximity effect. As expected, bass response increased at closer distances.

Background Noise Rejection

Keyboard typing with loud mechanical switches was introduced as background noise. The microphone maintained intelligibility of the primary voice signal while reducing the prominence of the keyboard noise.

Room Tone Tests

Recordings were made in both acoustically treated and untreated rooms. The microphone captured additional reflections in the untreated environment, consistent with expectations for a directional condenser microphone.

Shock Rejection Test

Desk and boom arm taps were used to assess vibration transfer through the included mount. The mount reduced handling noise to a noticeable degree but did not fully isolate the microphone from all vibrations.

Resonance Tap Test

Tapping on the microphone body was used to identify potential resonant frequencies. The microphone housing exhibited minimal ringing, suggesting effective internal damping.

Feature Demonstrations

High-Pass Filter

The 80 Hz and 160 Hz high-pass filter settings were demonstrated to show progressive low-frequency attenuation. Engaging the filter reduced bass content and helped control low-end buildup.

Pad

The -10 dB and -20 dB pad settings were tested using louder sound sources. Both settings effectively reduced signal level to prevent clipping.

Foam Windscreen

Recordings with and without the foam windscreen showed minor tonal differences. The windscreen primarily functions to reduce wind noise rather than alter frequency response.

Music Test

The microphone was used in a music recording context to evaluate its response on instruments and vocals. Results demonstrated adequate detail and clarity across multiple sources, with tonal balance influenced by placement and distance.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Detailed and articulate sound reproduction
  • Effective directional background noise reduction
  • Lightweight construction
  • Onboard pads and high-pass filters
  • High maximum SPL handling

Cons

  • Shock mount not included in the standard package

Overall Assessment

In controlled recording environments, the sE Electronics 6160 functions as a versatile shotgun microphone suitable for dialogue, spoken word, and select music applications. Its frequency response emphasizes detail and intelligibility, with controlled low frequencies and pronounced high-frequency presence. Performance varies depending on placement, room acoustics, and intended use.

The sE Electronics 6160 is well-suited for indoor dialogue, voice recording, and applications requiring directional sound capture. In controlled studio environments focused solely on music recording, small-diaphragm cardioid condensers may offer greater tonal flexibility and simpler placement. However, for users requiring a directional microphone with onboard filtering and pad options, the sE 6160 represents a capable option within its price range.

More about microphones:

FIFINE AM8 Microphone Review: USB/XLR Hybrid Mic for Gaming and Podcasting
The FIFINE AM8 delivers clear audio, dual connectivity, and stylish RGB lighting—making it ideal for podcasters and gamers alike.
CAD M179 Microphone: A Multi-Pattern Marvel for Your Studio?
Review of the CAD M179 multi-pattern condenser microphone. Explore its features, sound tests, polar patterns, and comparisons with other popular mics like the U87 Ai, AT2050, and more.
Sennheiser ME 2 Review: How Does It Stack Up Against the Competition?
Curious about the Sennheiser ME 2 lav mic? This review breaks down its sound, build quality, and how it compares to other popular lavaliers. Find out if it’s the right choice for your recording setup.

Comments

Latest